Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1odPPY-00045q-M2 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:15:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1odPPW-0003iJ-Nt for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:15:06 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1odPPW-0003hx-EI for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:15:06 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1odPPU-0002fU-AB for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:15:05 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 28S5EcHA3889344; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 01:14:38 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Dilip Kumar cc: Robert Haas , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Justin Pryzby Subject: Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why In-reply-to: References: <20220927200712.GH6256@telsasoft.com> <3825454.1664310917@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3837430.1664311847@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3843686.1664314154@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Dilip Kumar message dated "Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:34:15 +0530" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3889342.1664342078.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 01:14:38 -0400 Message-ID: <3889343.1664342078@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Dilip Kumar writes: > wrasse is also failing with a bus error, Yeah. At this point I think it's time to call for this patch to get reverted. It should get tested *off line* on some non-Intel, non-64-bit, alignment-picky architectures before the rest of us have to deal with it any more. There may be a larger conversation to be had here about how much our CI infrastructure should be detecting. There seems to be a depressingly large gap between what that found and what the buildfarm is finding --- not only in portability issues, but in things like cpluspluscheck failures, which I had supposed CI would find. regards, tom lane