Received: from me.tm.ee (ppp145.tele2.ee [212.107.33.145]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA65971 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 16:21:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hannu@tm.ee) Received: from tm.ee (IDENT:hannu@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by me.tm.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA00964; Mon, 22 May 2000 22:18:26 +0300 Message-ID: <39298802.7BF18AB3@tm.ee> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 22:18:26 +0300 From: Hannu Krosing X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marten Feldtmann CC: Chris Bitmead , Chris Bitmead , PostgreSQL Development Subject: Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) References: <200005221656.SAA02300@feki.toppoint.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200005/458 Marten Feldtmann wrote: > > > Hannu Krosing wrote: > > > > It's not such a big deal really. When you do an OO model you don't need > > to think about your own primary key. > > I don't remember saying that, must have been someone else. But it is true, you don't need anything but OID if you don't want to distinguish your objects yourself but only need them to be distinct for your program, i.e. yo have two cheques absolutely similar, except that there are two of them ;) ---------- Hannu