From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
        Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: add \dpS to psql
In-reply-to: <20221208041900.GB216874@nathanxps13>
References: <20221206193606.GB3078082@nathanxps13>
 <661148f4-c7f1-dec1-2bc8-29f3bd58e242@postgrespro.ru>
 <20221208023929.GB27893@telsasoft.com> <20221208041900.GB216874@nathanxps13>
Comments: In-reply-to Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 07 Dec 2022 20:19:00 -0800"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <39742.1670473532.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 23:25:32 -0500
Message-ID: <39743.1670473532@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/39743.1670473532%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> I haven't formed an opinion on whether VACUUM FULL should get its own bit,
> but FWIW І just finished writing the first draft of a patch set to add bits
> for CLUSTER, REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW, and REINDEX.  I plan to post that
> tomorrow.

The fact that we just doubled the number of available bits doesn't
mean we should immediately strive to use them up.  Perhaps it'd
be better to subsume these retail privileges under some generic
"maintenance action" privilege?

			regards, tom lane