Message-ID: <39770e3aebfdf543fa2215fb300621a54b1b2634.camel@j-davis.com>
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Cc: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, Matthias van de Meent
 <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Nathan
 Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Ashutosh Bapat
 <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>,
 PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, 
 alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 12:02:47 -0800
In-Reply-To: <Z22mcdRo_jTcA7nb@momjian.us>
References: 
	<CADkLM=fR7TwH0cLREQkf5_=KLcOYVxJw0Km0i5MpaWeuDwVo6g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CADkLM=fBaHichB7oS=LZNfTpGHSOTO44OKR28BwNmwu+9PicOg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ZzuZzDMxe3ClqAgF@momjian.us>
	 <CADkLM=cxNaU3O40Y5zGARJBWm-uAvb2hvgZxd=tOu-zTsrHpkQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5d3a24216d15ce8a50d0fc085a13a410202014ca.camel@j-davis.com>
	 <CADkLM=fcAneLoFrd41zdxm_1mMZz+wTp5gLJ=Av5JtBi5cBnDQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c2bc08dfec336c03f7a7165d1347e2b52cf98b17.camel@j-davis.com>
	 <CADkLM=fyJ-Y-DNk1aW09btZYdXDXS79xT8oFPTQ6sspWHaqdog@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3bd40d2c686608196b8e04c2aaac9c57c447aae6.camel@j-davis.com>
	 <CADkLM=cWc+Zbjnpew9sg346DdRQJj8OSvZjg4fwvpLH10EViJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <Z22mcdRo_jTcA7nb@momjian.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4-0ubuntu2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/39770e3aebfdf543fa2215fb300621a54b1b2634.camel%40j-davis.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2024-12-26 at 13:54 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am _again_ not happy with this part of the patch.=C2=A0 Please reply to
> the
> criticism in my November 19th email:
>=20
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Zz0T1BENIFDnXmwf@momjian.us
>=20
> rather than ignoring it and posting the same version of the patch.

I suggest that we make a new thread about the vacuumdb changes and
focus this thread and patch series on the pg_dump changes (and minor
flag adjustments to pg_upgrade).

Unless you think that the pg_dump changes should block on the vacuumdb
changes? In which case please let me know because the pg_dump changes
are otherwise close to commit.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis