Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZuzF-0000gW-Gg for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:05:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZuzE-0002fF-Ff for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:05:00 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZuzE-0002f7-7j for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:05:00 +0000 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZuz7-0002Sm-8u for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:04:59 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C88A60016; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set To: Peter Eisentraut , Michael Paquier , Tom Lane Cc: Postgres hackers References: <3715954.1633208613@sss.pgh.pa.us> <0f70fc0f-c51a-7a58-7e12-c702352eb076@dunslane.net> <3735235.1633232078@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4f54cd76-756e-ba8e-0238-cacf6dbc971b@enterprisedb.com> From: Andrew Dunstan Message-ID: <39d5c0ab-43c8-b7a3-adb6-d252fafad7b4@dunslane.net> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:04:47 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4f54cd76-756e-ba8e-0238-cacf6dbc971b@enterprisedb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 10/10/21 10:07 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 03.10.21 09:03, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 11:34:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Maybe we could leave test.sh in place for awhile?  I'd rather >>> not cause a flag day for buildfarm owners.  (Also, how do we >>> see this working in the back branches?) >> >> I would be fine with test.sh staying around for now. > > test.sh could be changed to invoke the TAP test. Keeping test.sh is not necessary - I mis-remembered what the test module does. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com