Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uWNN5-00Cy29-Fn for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 22:53:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uWNN1-002f3Z-V2 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 22:53:04 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uWNN1-002f3Q-HU for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 22:53:04 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uWNN0-004zFs-06 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 22:53:03 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821A53E65E6 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:53:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s981.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1363E6C4E; Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:53:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s470.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s981.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F4622B1711; Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:53:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s470.loopia.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s899.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by s470.loopia.se (s470.loopia.se [172.22.190.34]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8LMTP id fzqAo2PcFrGR; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 00:53:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.236 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-236.stosn.net [89.255.232.236]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s899.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E59A2C8BA8B; Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:52:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1751323979; bh=b6fhSy7rW56onTe+/vtnhRaLKuPZOG64RjCTwVeW9qU=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Kz4xisKbp7ACl0OJADMgmD/3iWI0WMFNOagR+BBCbVjCx8rGTmcalcT6jDobE0jIX c0Py/rz3QTB36/mWgaxNw7u1H72UynXw7tBxk8nnAF2hEbVcKJwbrW1Xi0Pqr63xH9 iCxqsP3LGwWt0jP/sOPhCYqIbnd0FnWvpoeJyC4BanGH8IM+BWol8Xsfpbb6Rq+xJf nnRVJiQ11Nn+2vYvjSHBMynm28Na8x3KOjRXVHKJYJsT6eaE9W6GKhJngFJocS32+x HqxA5nBHTcyA4e3qpZuGa7wSWpP3NkBJpqa6eqinthkPjNDcmaQtSENUYFiZY/7/3M uj3l7hBS+1h0w== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.2\)) Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 00:52:49 +0200 Cc: Andres Freund , Nathan Bossart , Christoph Berg , Jelte Fennema-Nio , Peter Eisentraut , Tom Lane , Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL Hackers , Thomas Munro , Nazir Bilal Yavuz , Antonin Houska , Wolfgang Walther , =?utf-8?B?RGV2cmltIEfDvG5kw7x6?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3C8CE715-37F7-479D-A8F8-1556253A02F9@yesql.se> References: <4D576856-A28D-450A-9855-F0D4F0EFADF7@yesql.se> To: Jacob Champion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.2) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 30 Jun 2025, at 20:33, Jacob Champion = wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:02=E2=80=AFAM Daniel Gustafsson = wrote: >>> On 30 Jun 2025, at 18:58, Andres Freund wrote: >>> Probably just needs to be added to the installed_targets list. >>=20 >> Thanks for the report, I'll take a look today to get it fixed. >=20 > Thanks both! >=20 > Looking at the installed_targets stuff, though... why do we use `meson > install --no-rebuild` in combination with `depends: > installed_targets`? Can't we just use Meson's dependency tracking > during installation, and avoid this hazard? I suspect it is because without --no-rebuild the quiet target isn't = entirely quiet. Still, I was unable to make something that work in all build combinations while keeping --no-rebuild (which isn't indicative of it = being possible to do). Is --no-rebuild just there to reduce output noise, or = is there another reason that I don't see? -- Daniel Gustafsson