Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14246475978
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Aug 2002 02:29:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from joeconway.com (unknown [63.210.180.150])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7474C4758BB
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Aug 2002 02:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.5.2] (account jconway HELO joeconway.com)
	by joeconway.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
	with ESMTP-TLS id 1291693; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:17:38 -0700
Message-ID: <3D633333.3040500@joeconway.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:29:07 -0700
From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: make "opaque" obsolete
References: <18530.1029866880@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <1029867570.99470.82.camel@jester>
	<19248.1029868284@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3D6325FC.8020608@joeconway.com>
	<17737.1029910488@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200208/1584
X-Sequence-Number: 27268

Tom Lane wrote:
>>>...  Then you could actually do something interesting with
>>>a function taking anyarraytype.
> 
>>This sounds very cool. I'd vote for that.
> 
> Um, am I hearing a volunteer to make it happen?  I have other problems
> I need to deal with ...
> 

Hmmm. I guess I should be careful what I wish for -- and plan to take 
some time-off from my "day job" between now and September 1st ;-)

I'll give it a shot, but a crude gameplan/general guidance to get me 
started would be much appreciated.

Joe