Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241F2476A2F
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 23:23:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from joeconway.com (unknown [63.210.180.150])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A38E4769C2
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 23:23:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.5.3] (account jconway HELO joeconway.com)
	by joeconway.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
	with ESMTP-TLS id 1337950; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:02:09 -0700
Message-ID: <3D927D47.6060702@joeconway.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:21:43 -0700
From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel
References: <200209260211.g8Q2Bm125991@candle.pha.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200209/1508
X-Sequence-Number: 29465

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, I thought you were changing connection_timeout, which is libpq and
> not a GUC parameter

Yup, you're right -- I got myself confused. Sorry.

> not statement_timeout.  Do we want sub-second
> timeout values?  Not sure.
> 

I found it surprising that the statement_timeout was not in units of seconds, 
but that's only because I read the docs after I tried it instead of before. I 
can't think of a reason to have sub-second values, but it's probably not worth 
changing it at this point.

Joe