Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A39F475D93 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:32:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joeconway.com (unknown [63.210.180.150]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C300B475C85 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [206.19.64.3] (account jconway HELO joeconway.com) by joeconway.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP-TLS id 1341611; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:10:06 -0700 Message-ID: <3D986E28.60404@joeconway.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:30:48 -0700 From: Joe Conway User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane Cc: Andrew Sullivan , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: 7.2.3 fixes (was Re: Cause of missing pg_clog files) References: <8183.1033166430@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200209280030.g8S0UcR16258@candle.pha.pa.us> <20020930103138.C1405@mail.libertyrms.com> <21492.1033399107@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200209/1780 X-Sequence-Number: 29737 Tom Lane wrote: > One thing I am undecided about: I am more than half tempted to put in > the fix that makes us able to cope with mktime's broken-before-1970 > behavior in recent glibc versions (e.g., Red Hat 7.3). This seems like > a good idea considering that other Linux distros will surely be updating > glibc soon too. On the other hand, it's hard to call it a critical bug > fix --- it ain't on a par with the vacuum/clog problem, for sure. And > the patch has received only limited testing (basically just whatever > use 7.3beta1 has had). On the third hand, the patch only does something > if mktime() has already failed, so it's hard to see how it could make > life worse even if it's buggy. > > Any votes on whether to fix that or leave it alone in 7.2.3? I need > some input in the next few hours ... > +1 for fixing it Joe