Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6DF475B8A for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 01:46:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from www.pspl.co.in (www.pspl.co.in [202.54.11.65]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E56475A1E for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 01:46:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by www.pspl.co.in (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g985mNI22567 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:18:23 +0530 Received: from daithan (daithan.intranet.pspl.co.in [192.168.7.161]) by www.pspl.co.in (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g985mNv22557; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:18:23 +0530 From: "Shridhar Daithankar" To: , "pgsql-general" Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 11:17:18 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup Reply-To: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in Message-ID: <3DA2BEBE.26020.13D2582A@localhost> References: <4AFE42D73ED1F345A576D3290FF8421C17674A@exchange.nnco.net> In-reply-to: <877kguqgxb.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200210/419 X-Sequence-Number: 31417 On 7 Oct 2002 at 13:48, Neil Conway wrote: > "Sandeep Chadha" writes: > > Postgresql has been lacking this all along. I've installed postgres > > 7.3b2 and still don't see any archive's flushed to any other > > place. Please let me know how is hot backup procedure implemented in > > current 7.3 beta(2) release. > AFAIK no such hot backup feature has been implemented for 7.3 -- you > appear to have been misinformed. Is replication an answer to hot backup? Bye Shridhar -- ink, n.: A villainous compound of tannogallate of iron, gum-arabic, and water, chiefly used to facilitate the infection of idiocy and promote intellectual crime. -- H.L. Mencken