X-Original-To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14AB475CBC for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 18:19:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp02.web.de [217.72.192.151]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF86A475ADE for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 18:19:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from p50818e4d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.129.142.77] helo=web.de) by smtp.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE(Exim) 4.97 #53) id 19AdRa-0008Ae-00; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 00:19:22 +0200 Message-ID: <3EAEFA6D.6030304@web.de> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 00:19:25 +0200 From: Andreas Pflug User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane , Dave Page , pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_namespace -> pg_schema? References: <20030425213956.GK79923@perrin.int.nxad.com> <3099.1051309254@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <3099.1051309254@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-34.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,RCVD_IN_NJABL, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/137 X-Sequence-Number: 1111 Tom Lane wrote: >Sean Chittenden writes: > > >>I know pg_namespace has been in release for one rev, but I was >>wondering if for consistency sake there was any interest or desire or >>plans to change the system catalog to pg_schema. >> >> > >No. The choice of catalog name was deliberate: a namespace is not >necessarily identical to a schema. In any case, I can see no value >to renaming it at this late date. > > regards, tom lane > > I wonder if we should use the term NAMESPACE instead of SCHEMA in pgAdmin3. Any suggestions? Andreas