Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myDv0-0000In-3k for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:09:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myDuy-0004If-UM for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:09:04 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myDuy-0004IW-LD for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:09:04 +0000 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myDuu-0007JK-Va for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:09:03 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EE0B10000E; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <3faa2e7d-a38d-9a01-e5e2-1f897905cebf@dunslane.net> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree Content-Language: en-US To: Andres Freund , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Cc: Thomas Munro , Melanie Plageman , Tom Lane References: <20211213211223.vkgg3wwiss2tragj@alap3.anarazel.de> From: Andrew Dunstan In-Reply-To: <20211213211223.vkgg3wwiss2tragj@alap3.anarazel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 12/13/21 16:12, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > Attached is an updated version of the CI patches. An example of a test run > with the attached version of this > https://cirrus-ci.com/build/6501998521483264 > Maye I have missed it, but why are we using ccache here? That seems a bit pointless in an ephemeral instance. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com