Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wD5Eo-002aMg-2H for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:45:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wD5En-001WA8-2q for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:45:21 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wD5En-001WA0-1b for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:45:21 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wD5El-00000001GqZ-1ums for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:45:21 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A530B5DC1E6 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 20:45:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s979.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957535DC9A9; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 20:45:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s979.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9200410BC3C9; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 20:45:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s470.loopia.se (amavis); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s980.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by localhost (s470.loopia.se [172.22.190.34]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id uRkwrR5Zhyra; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 20:45:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.236 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-236.stosn.net [89.255.232.236]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s980.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3BAA2201624; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 20:45:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1776278718; bh=zztZg+XHHkZVyei7UszDiYKLiJeT6ctD//AvX0D5SzY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=m7ykRGgI7YVUJKEjz0rz//IfdcjqFd81ndDNgkD0dD0k1cuIJmpETMFqJoQrXK9Dg 2AmaSH/4fiaHqZpTor3sV1zO5lj48RAT0U6IVXbg5aadBksvOlwKMsLvtrzR7oJMed PATCSZQdFD2qUHkPeY51tIb/tHhp5ZbDkr1XcDGit0J/6nE9Qy0knOye/T2D2fJFMI Q4cKyKNJneNKg85bGb8qzrfVWmxlCcfYN4Y8ceSk1RECmEkdVZ1O/l55JBFjFNDeUU hxqQetgy2GaSO93qtDnCKVe3vn3ByZeuYRDJbCoAtt92zXoDVqmTEg1Vp+SA8V1LYC 7lU+1Rn9JNN/A== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.2\)) Subject: Re: Do we still need gen_node_support.pl's nodetag ABI stability check? From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: <2095866.1776276826@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 20:45:07 +0200 Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <401DA47A-D9C7-4EEE-B1A8-083B0C9A92E1@yesql.se> References: <1458883.1776143073@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2095866.1776276826@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.2) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 15 Apr 2026, at 20:13, Tom Lane wrote: > Barring objections, I'll push this soon. +1, the new checks are far more comprehensive. Looks good from a readthrough and grepping the codebase doesn't turn up any other mentions. -- Daniel Gustafsson