Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1u2Csi-00Eg6Z-Kc
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 17:37:04 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1u2Csh-00D5Yb-3H
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 17:37:03 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1u2Csg-00D5YS-QA
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 17:37:03 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1u2Cse-004B9G-30
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org;
	Tue, 08 Apr 2025 17:37:02 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 538HawLd4054390;
	Tue, 8 Apr 2025 13:36:58 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>
cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
        PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
In-reply-to: <CAMT0RQTCxjfK_fU4bBLw0Xv61vUEqP4TfNqYJGRmMqqikPBZ3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMT0RQSS-6qLH+zYsOeUbAYhop3wmQTkNmQpo5--QRDUR+qYmQ@mail.gmail.com> <Z_RO37whB1L2LbiD@nathan> <CAMT0RQRL08=Si+9V7RW7VKcbo2H7GO6ME3opkS_WHpE8qctBLg@mail.gmail.com> <Z_VE4Q4A2nNCX3Ny@nathan> <4044567.1744128814@sss.pgh.pa.us> <CAMT0RQSALxZ2DJbq0b5cy+cvmpVxkawmv7c+qTWYObubZVr+2g@mail.gmail.com> <4047312.1744130263@sss.pgh.pa.us> <Z_VTucTiS01p-d6z@nathan> <4050387.1744132029@sss.pgh.pa.us> <CAMT0RQTCxjfK_fU4bBLw0Xv61vUEqP4TfNqYJGRmMqqikPBZ3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>
	message dated "Tue, 08 Apr 2025 19:18:31 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4054388.1744133818.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 13:36:58 -0400
Message-ID: <4054389.1744133818@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4054389.1744133818%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Hmm ... one annoying thing for this project is that AFAICS pg_upgrade
does *not* preserve database OIDs, which is problematic for using
COPY to load pg_shdepend rows.

			regards, tom lane