X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705DAD1B1D2 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:51:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39267-07 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:52:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mako1.telstra.net (mako1.telstra.net [203.50.0.28]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749C7D1B1CD for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:51:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from telstra.net (xena.telstra.net [203.50.0.233]) by mako1.telstra.net (8.12.9/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i622psB4078705; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:51:55 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jc@telstra.net) Message-ID: <40E4CD85.1040000@telstra.net> Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:50:45 +1000 From: Justin Clift User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040406 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Sabino Mullane Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns References: <270f2a128cf161491a34c16ee00b082e@biglumber.com> In-Reply-To: <270f2a128cf161491a34c16ee00b082e@biglumber.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/78 X-Sequence-Number: 55639 Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > If there is that much clamor for this, why not make a new schema, > such as "pginformation_schema" People could then tweak the views > to their heart's content, while keeping 100% compliance. Doesn't sound very neat. If we add a pginformation_schema, then it'd probably contain all of the existing information_schema... plus more. Reduplication? I guess we could just leverage off the existing information_schema views: i.e. CREATE VIEW pg_information_schmema.some_view AS SELECT * FROM information_schema.some_view (then add extra bits). But it still doesn't sound very neat. ? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift