X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87935E46C8 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 00:23:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12490-06 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 03:22:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp015.mail.yahoo.com (smtp015.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.59]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 619D35E46BF for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 00:21:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from unknown (HELO jupiter.black-lion.info) (janwieck@68.80.245.191 with login) by smtp015.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2004 03:08:54 -0000 Received: from [172.21.8.18] ([192.168.192.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by jupiter.black-lion.info (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7738r3v056353; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:08:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from JanWieck@Yahoo.com) Message-ID: <411447C6.9050108@Yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 23:08:54 -0400 From: Jan Wieck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: "Matthew T. O'Connor" , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Vacuum Cost Documentation? References: <200408070104.i77144Y00681@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200408070104.i77144Y00681@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_DNS_FOR_FROM X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200408/315 X-Sequence-Number: 57287 On 8/6/2004 9:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Updated. Thanks. I thought we want to have the feature activated ... I reversed your change and brought guc.c in sync instead. Jan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: >> Related to autovacuum work, I was looking into the new vacuum delay >> functionality. I might be missing something, but I can't find anything >> on it in the developer docs. Is that right? >> >> Also, in the default postgresql.conf there is: >> >> #vacuum_cost_naptime = 50 # 0-1000 milliseconds >> >> however psql reports this value as 0. I assume this is just >> postgresql.conf is just wrong. Can we fix this so it's consistent? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matthew O'Connor >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org >> > -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #