X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEC95E40BA for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 08:10:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81490-03 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:10:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0855E4249 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 08:10:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by news.hub.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i77BABiI083171 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:10:11 GMT (envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.hub.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i77AfmqP076313 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 10:41:48 GMT From: Gaetano Mendola X-Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql.hackers Subject: Re: Vacuum Cost Documentation? Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 12:41:13 +0200 Organization: PYRENET Midi-pyrenees Provider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <4114B1C9.9080104@bigfoot.com> References: <411447C6.9050108@Yahoo.com> <200408070334.i773YjP08668@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@pyrenet.fr To: Bruce Momjian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <200408070334.i773YjP08668@candle.pha.pa.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/340 X-Sequence-Number: 57311 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Jan Wieck wrote: > >>On 8/6/2004 9:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> >>>Updated. Thanks. >> >>I thought we want to have the feature activated ... I reversed your >>change and brought guc.c in sync instead. > > > Uh, if the guy is doing a vacuum at night, does he want the delay? > Seems someone should have to enable the delay by default, or does your > setup recoginize when it is being run on a lightly loaded system? TODO: make vacuum_cost_naptime aware of system load :-) Regards Gaetano Mendola