Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E2763340C
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:11:10 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 55955-02
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:11:08 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com (exprod7og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.169])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 272646340DF
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:11:07 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from source ([209.85.220.218]) by exprod7ob108.postini.com
	([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP
	ID DSNKSjAFSrWDqOKSj4gczG1M0W2dhhvRZpaQ@postini.com;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:11:08 PDT
Received: by mail-fx0-f218.google.com with SMTP id 18so1028431fxm.32
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.119.198 with SMTP id a6mr1631775far.42.1244661066166;
 Wed,
	10 Jun 2009 12:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200906101904.n5AJ44Z26240@momjian.us>
References: <4A30017D.5000309@dunslane.net>
	<200906101904.n5AJ44Z26240@momjian.us>
From: Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:10:46 +0100
Message-ID: <4136ffa0906101210u5dd5182bt53980a914ffe5145@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pgindent run coming
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200906/793
X-Sequence-Number: 139848

Out of curiosity how different is the output if we don't pass the
typedef list at all? I'm wondering if the formatting differences are
things we actually care much about anyways.