Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG3i9-0007ui-AY for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 17:16:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG3i7-0005ZG-CF for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 17:16:43 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG3i7-0005Z7-5r for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 17:16:43 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG3i0-0000u5-8v for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 17:16:42 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 089HGXRn042801; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:16:34 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Fujii Masao cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Fujii Masao Subject: Re: Remove line length restriction in passwordFromFile() In-reply-to: References: <4187382.1598909041@sss.pgh.pa.us> <90aed8c6-a171-4cf7-4e4a-0d4d9593f6c5@oss.nttdata.com> <54742.1598973287@sss.pgh.pa.us> <12eff40e-80df-244e-86b8-c60b0e88bc75@oss.nttdata.com> <41713.1599670097@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Fujii Masao message dated "Thu, 10 Sep 2020 02:00:15 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <42799.1599671793.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:16:33 -0400 Message-ID: <42800.1599671793@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Fujii Masao writes: > On 2020/09/10 1:48, Tom Lane wrote: >> We could adjust the release-note entry for your patch to say >> "Improve comment detection for .pgpass files", or we could decide >> it's not worth documenting that part and just drop the entry. > "Improve comment detection for .pgpass files" is also the material for > minor version release because that change was also back-patched? > If so, I agree to drop the entry. Hm, in a quick search I only see 2eb3bc588 which was not back-patched ... which commits are you thinking of? regards, tom lane