X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D4552B03 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:15:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27838-04 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:14:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailbox.samurai.com (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B90252B01 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:14:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7A49B4B1; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 10:14:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailbox.samurai.com ([205.207.28.82]) by localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 85196-01-9; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 10:14:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [220.101.4.182] (r220-101-4-182.cpe.unwired.net.au [220.101.4.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF69B4B5; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 10:14:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42D12D3C.2010404@samurai.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:14:20 +1000 From: Neil Conway User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Pavel Stehule , Tom Lane , pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: User's exception plpgsql References: <200507101409.j6AE9Bt08428@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200507101409.j6AE9Bt08428@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailbox.samurai.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.005 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200507/268 X-Sequence-Number: 16608 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Where are we on this patch? Is there something to apply? Not at the moment. I believe we have agreed that it would be better to remove the concept of "exception variables" and just use strings, but I haven't implemented this yet. I'm happy to do that, but I might not get a chance till Wednesday. -Neil