Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tGtum-001dU4-3J for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:51:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tGtuj-0044ua-3A for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:51:38 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tGtui-0044uS-Ku for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:51:38 +0000 Received: from mail.postgrespro.ru ([93.174.131.139]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tGtug-0005si-F3 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:51:36 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=postgrespro.ru; s=mx2023; t=1732859493; bh=NuE89YQ0ynlJzuV1KzdKno8HtiwnARJGPapdPbUAq9U=; h=Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:From; b=Ra1+0SSQGGYtid3cfBa3VR8fq+186UgfCGlhF/G5MYmF13ZSRG16F8bDWq4tnRhox QRJM9ayEwgdW241Qqlckbd7XpfJyuYg4lcG7L76oDvBFSdAW/2FzazL57QYKtDIWR1 ja3emsbByfKM5PgWfX1DkGxzzAVNER1kkB6Bhcwkt3mooqYFBbvbJ41gOSpaZVDAUH wnfP3oSduuU6n732R3vNEp6JYLRWDTooXsq6qlUB91rSQHB+pOQmcGLWGhjU88usrk JT4+n2nL1qwaGq6vINS4nOUzuOH4yrkb+/Se7UhEamd/hNTw0/IS4tilJ5xhHl60Ar /3M8ZWdXzWPOA== Received: from [192.168.247.77] (unknown [212.233.84.108]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru) by mail.postgrespro.ru (Postfix/587) with ESMTPSA id 33F506070C; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:51:33 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <43db6a40-5c5f-4909-ad62-3060b297e686@postgrespro.ru> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:51:30 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes To: Alexander Korotkov Cc: Ranier Vilela , Alexander Lakhin , Andrei Lepikhov , jian he , Robert Haas , Nikolay Shaplov , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Geoghegan , Marcos Pegoraro , teodor@sigaev.ru, Peter Eisentraut References: <567ED6CA.2040504@sigaev.ru> <45050ba9-3777-4cc1-89ad-a02deebe7729@gmail.com> <0026f562-d403-4f97-b9dc-3fe3a279e8c9@postgrespro.ru> <37bf870a-22e0-4aba-b845-549482118f8d@gmail.com> <8174de69-9e1a-0827-0e81-ef97f56a5939@gmail.com> <3b717020-14d9-425f-8c60-ce336b5a23b3@postgrespro.ru> Content-Language: en-US From: Alena Rybakina In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-KSMG-AntiPhishing: NotDetected X-KSMG-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KSMG-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KSMG-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Secure Mail Gateway, version 2.1.0.7854, bases: 2024/11/29 02:02:00 #26910896 X-KSMG-AntiVirus-Status: NotDetected, skipped X-KSMG-LinksScanning: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KSMG-Message-Action: skipped X-KSMG-Rule-ID: 1 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 29.11.2024 03:04, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 9:33 PM Alena Rybakina > wrote: >> On 28.11.2024 22:28, Ranier Vilela wrote: >> >> Em qui., 28 de nov. de 2024 às 16:03, Alena Rybakina escreveu: >>> Hi! Thank you for the case. >>> >>> On 28.11.2024 21:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote: >>>> Hello Alexander, >>>> >>>> 21.11.2024 09:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >>>>> I'm going to push this if no objections. >>>> Please look at the following query, which triggers an error after >>>> ae4569161: >>>> SET random_page_cost = 1; >>>> CREATE TABLE tbl(u UUID); >>>> CREATE INDEX idx ON tbl USING HASH (u); >>>> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl WHERE u = '00000000000000000000000000000000' OR >>>> u = '11111111111111111111111111111111'; >>>> >>>> ERROR: XX000: ScalarArrayOpExpr index qual found where not allowed >>>> LOCATION: ExecIndexBuildScanKeys, nodeIndexscan.c:1625 >>>> >>>> >>> I found out what the problem is index scan method was not generated. We >>> need to check this during OR clauses for SAOP transformation. >>> >>> There is a patch to fix this problem. >> Hi. >> Thanks for the quick fix. >> >> But I wonder if it is not possible to avoid all if the index is useless? >> Maybe moving your fix to the beginning of the function? >> >> diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c >> index d827fc9f4d..5ea0b27d01 100644 >> --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c >> +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c >> @@ -3248,6 +3248,10 @@ match_orclause_to_indexcol(PlannerInfo *root, >> Assert(IsA(orclause, BoolExpr)); >> Assert(orclause->boolop == OR_EXPR); >> >> + /* Ignore index if it doesn't support index scans */ >> + if(!index->amsearcharray) >> + return NULL; >> + >> >> Agree. I have updated the patch >> >> /* >> * Try to convert a list of OR-clauses to a single SAOP expression. Each >> * OR entry must be in the form: (indexkey operator constant) or (constant >> >> The test bug: >> EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl WHERE u = '00000000000000000000000000000000' OR u = '11111111111111111111111111111111'; >> QUERY PLAN >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Aggregate (cost=12.46..12.47 rows=1 width=8) >> -> Bitmap Heap Scan on tbl (cost=2.14..12.41 rows=18 width=0) >> Recheck Cond: ((u = '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'::uuid) OR (u = '11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'::uuid)) >> -> BitmapOr (cost=2.14..2.14 rows=18 width=0) >> -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=9 width=0) >> Index Cond: (u = '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'::uuid) >> -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=9 width=0) >> Index Cond: (u = '11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'::uuid) >> (8 rows) > I slightly revised the fix and added similar check to > group_similar_or_args(). Could you, please, review that before > commit? > I agree with changes. Thank you! -- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional