X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx2.hub.org [200.46.204.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DD711F6691 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:31:07 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx2.hub.org [200.46.204.254]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmhPVI9rmSSp for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:31:00 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from smtp.osdl.org (smtp.osdl.org [65.172.181.4]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC0411F6093 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:30:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.0.14] (nv-71-0-139-147.sta.sprint-hsd.net [71.0.139.147]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3IIRgtH012924 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:27:43 -0700 Message-ID: <44452F9C.8000401@osdl.org> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:27:40 -0700 From: Mark Wong User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060415) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jim C. Nasby" CC: "Jonah H. Harris" , Pgsql Hackers Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request References: <36e682920604151205i75a08030x7c05a6f52fccf095@mail.gmail.com> <20060417205455.GP49405@pervasive.com> In-Reply-To: <20060417205455.GP49405@pervasive.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.133 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 X-Archive-Number: 200604/676 X-Sequence-Number: 82399 Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:05:20PM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote: >> All ideas welcome! > > I know it's not directly PostgreSQL related, but I'd love to see the > dbt* code improved. Items on my wish-list: > > - make it easy to run the test framework and clients on a seperate > machine from the database server > - keep results in a database > - provide a front-end to allow users to schedule tests in a queue > - add support for windows, at least for the database (theoretically > possible to run that way now, but you have to do everything by hand) > > Another idea: afaik, spikesource is still offering a bounty for > improvements to OSS test suites, something that'd fit well with SoC. I second this. :) There are also the TPC-App (Java) fair-use implementation that I've started and the TPC-E (next gen OLTP) that I would like to start. Mark