Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lX6OU-00074g-Jp for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:07:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lX6OT-0001FP-Hp for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:07:09 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lX6OT-0001FI-AH for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:07:09 +0000 Received: from wforward1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.30]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lX6OP-0004BJ-5K for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:07:08 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailforward.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249671A60; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:07:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:07:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=n6dMZ4Z8m6s6g84i5sEWGTPgJxbNBaTQ+W+e2VTy7 Hw=; b=e90+NLV+MhTeD0UoXKYLTXg9b2eZfhDzgRQ9bVTZ/5j4AQpwba1rurQfm Y1YHiRxhO9fZL2J4cFkVpojgcLqLseJE78NIrGzXuThVSdeOrsuNnA3gFrbtRP5d /Vx+3nOQG98bXnvkUslLjJLXXlDsklJo6zGMvW/39f3eoD1l8zymL44ITjXFoihb suHerLkZkSuwFfpohUx7O+wjW2rCjBfu83014k//j+UguZLCPdUfQHDAWkmtw8YB 5asbo9PL8SA9Sa2gxfZq++rjfPLkr6Sx5VILmgiLDALPoy1bFat4cLRiIhIFGUOT INYXQi4ru9Dw4uy7fM3ZOen41KRVw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudelfedguddvhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvght vghrucfgihhsvghnthhrrghuthcuoehpvghtvghrrdgvihhsvghnthhrrghuthesvghnth gvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelveehheeuieduieet iedtkeeuteelfeetjeffieffudegvdffvdfftdeivdeukeenucfkphepleefrddvtddvrd dvheefrddugeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepphgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtsegvnhhtvghrphhrihhsvggusgdrtg homh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from laptop206oxuk.local (p5dcafd8f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.202.253.143]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B06F21080057; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option To: Fabien COELHO , Tom Lane Cc: Michael Paquier , Alvaro Herrera , "Bossart, Nathan" , Julien Rouhaud , "shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com" , "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" References: <69C0B369-570C-4524-8EE4-BCCACECB6BEE@amazon.com> <20210412193301.GA11204@alvherre.pgsql> <3738387.1618451507@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Peter Eisentraut Message-ID: <451a2111-3757-c511-9413-8f8af531a167@enterprisedb.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:06:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 15.04.21 13:51, Fabien COELHO wrote: >>> That's a lot IMO, so my vote would be to discard this feature for now >>> and revisit it properly in the 15 dev cycle, so as resources are >>> redirected into more urgent issues (13 open items as of the moment of >>> writing this email). >> >> I don't wish to tell people which open issues they ought to work on >> ... but this patch seems like it could be quite a large can of worms, >> and I'm not detecting very much urgency about getting it fixed. >> If it's not to be reverted then some significant effort needs to be >> put into it soon. > > My overly naive trust in non regression test to catch any issues has > been largely proven wrong. Three key features do not have a single > tests. Sigh. > > I'll have some time to look at it over next week-end, but not before. I have reverted the patch and moved the commit fest entry to CF 2021-07.