Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG4qP-00025o-6s for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:29:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG4qO-0005op-4n for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:29:20 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG4qN-0005oi-UP for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:29:19 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG4qL-0006Fe-Le for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:29:18 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 089ITGHL045872; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:29:16 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Fujii Masao cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Fujii Masao Subject: Re: Remove line length restriction in passwordFromFile() In-reply-to: <6cf14b04-86c6-e34a-4479-062c4bd448e3@oss.nttdata.com> References: <4187382.1598909041@sss.pgh.pa.us> <90aed8c6-a171-4cf7-4e4a-0d4d9593f6c5@oss.nttdata.com> <54742.1598973287@sss.pgh.pa.us> <12eff40e-80df-244e-86b8-c60b0e88bc75@oss.nttdata.com> <41713.1599670097@sss.pgh.pa.us> <42800.1599671793@sss.pgh.pa.us> <6cf14b04-86c6-e34a-4479-062c4bd448e3@oss.nttdata.com> Comments: In-reply-to Fujii Masao message dated "Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:20:54 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <45870.1599676156.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:29:16 -0400 Message-ID: <45871.1599676156@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Fujii Masao writes: > On 2020/09/10 2:16, Tom Lane wrote: >> Hm, in a quick search I only see 2eb3bc588 which was not back-patched >> ... which commits are you thinking of? > I thought your commit b55b4dad99 included the improvement on comment det= ection and was back-patched.... Oh, right, I did include the check for '#' in what was back-patched. I debated whether to do that or not, and was misremembering my decision. So yeah, it seems there's no need to document 2eb3bc588 in the v13 notes. I'll try to remember to give you part credit for b55b4dad9 when I do the November notes. regards, tom lane