From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
        Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
        Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
        Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
        PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
In-reply-to: <5AADB130.2020206@anastigmatix.net>
References: <579297F8.7020107@anastigmatix.net>
 <CA+TgmoaJR3s6CymT2wa9L5QR0pKY0cBthfece8MtxaBADMXw0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <5797D953.6040806@anastigmatix.net> <20160802183347.GD32575@momjian.us>
 <CA+TgmobKFW5eVx4gd9TyiXv9iL_5DcC0-6UuJLXvwG1Ft1Pn-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20943eba-bbb9-390c-01b1-e6704ce33c7b@iki.fi>
 <594C9457.6000708@anastigmatix.net> <59506148.1010708@anastigmatix.net>
 <2b9ed9a4-56a6-a4db-0abf-3527d993e2d4@iki.fi>
 <fe79f7c5-2bc5-f763-8908-78675ba33eba@anastigmatix.net>
 <d190140f-b6e8-5e2f-c663-c8f9617da18e@iki.fi>
 <CAB7nPqQr1D3gjx8CmHYQREidG2eeGHzx2yQ97B3t2L99GE=+kQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5A92F0C0.7070706@anastigmatix.net>
 <C0523BD1-485D-48B5-982E-8D63E2D001B7@yesql.se>
 <5AADB130.2020206@anastigmatix.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
	message dated "Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:22:08 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4596.1521338981.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 22:09:41 -0400
Message-ID: <4597.1521338981@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> writes:
> Thanks for the review. I notice that cfbot has now flagged the patch as
> failing, and when I look into it, it appears that cfbot is building with
> your test patch, and without the xlog.c patch, and so the test naturally
> fails. Does the cfbot require both patches to be attached to the same
> email, in order to include them both?

I believe so --- AFAIK it does not know anything about dependencies
between different patches, and will just try to build whatever patch(es)
appear in the latest email on a given thread.  Munro might be able to
provide more detail.

			regards, tom lane