pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Operator family docs
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Operator family docs
@ 2007-01-10 10:08  Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Dave Page @ 2007-01-10 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-hackers

http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html
states that

"Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14."

which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit?

Regards, Dave.



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Operator family docs
@ 2007-01-10 14:28  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  parent: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2007-01-10 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>; +Cc: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html
> states that
> "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14."
> which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit?

No, I haven't got round to updating xindex.sgml yet.  I'm planning to do
just one pass over it after all the opfamily and sorting dust settles...
In the related commits so far, I've just been touching reference
pages for the most part (catalogs.sgml is a reference page in my mind).

			regards, tom lane



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Operator family docs
@ 2007-01-10 14:30  Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
  parent: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: Dave Page @ 2007-01-10 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
>> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html
>> states that
>> "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14."
>> which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit?
> 
> No, I haven't got round to updating xindex.sgml yet.  I'm planning to do
> just one pass over it after all the opfamily and sorting dust settles...
> In the related commits so far, I've just been touching reference
> pages for the most part (catalogs.sgml is a reference page in my mind).

OK, thanks.

Regards, Dave.



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-10 14:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-10 10:08 Operator family docs Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
2007-01-10 14:28 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2007-01-10 14:30   ` Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox