Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042459FB818; Wed, 9 May 2007 09:40:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75524-02; Wed, 9 May 2007 09:40:28 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from community1.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C129FB510; Wed, 9 May 2007 09:40:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.10.103] (cpe-075-177-135-163.nc.res.rr.com [75.177.135.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by community1.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887D1246DC1; Wed, 9 May 2007 05:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4641C138.4040703@dunslane.net> Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 08:40:24 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070301 Fedora/1.0.8-0.6.2.fc6 pango-text SeaMonkey/1.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Eisentraut CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Dave Page , meskes@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Windows Vista support (Buildfarm Vaquita) References: <464184A7.1030300@postgresql.org> <20070509090117.GA18105@feivel.credativ.de> <4641B4AC.40600@postgresql.org> <200705091420.45255.peter_e@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200705091420.45255.peter_e@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200705/401 X-Sequence-Number: 103003 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2007 13:46 schrieb Dave Page: > >> Can we rename the test please? >> > > I'm thinking no. Brain-dead systems should produce brain-dead test results. > > Not doing this would seem like sheer bloody-mindedness. We have workarounds for craziness on many systems. Not providing for this will mean that we have to disable the ECPG tests for Vista. I don't see how that helps anyone. More seriously, we need to get the ECPG regression test rewritten in C, as was done for the main line regression tests. Maybe we need to factor out some of that into a library so the common code can be used in both programs. At any rate, until this is done we can't run the ECPG tests on MSVC builds. cheers andrew