Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drW74-0005My-FH for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:19:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drW73-0003tz-Tf for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:19:25 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drW72-0003sz-VT for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:19:25 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drW70-0003vF-4I for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:19:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v8BLJFss004676; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:19:15 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> cc: Arthur Zakirov , David Steele , Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting In-reply-to: References: <3939224.Pu1MPp1GC3@zakirov> <20170909213349.GA17898@arthur.localdomain> Comments: In-reply-to Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> message dated "Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:12:29 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4674.1505164755.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:19:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4675.1505164755@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> writes: > About dependencies between functions - as far as I understand one cannot > create a `pg_depend` entry or any other kind of dependencies between > custom user-defined functions. Uh, what? Sure you can. Just because the existing code never has a reason to create such a dependency doesn't mean it wouldn't work. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers