Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BC09F97C1
	for <pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:24:37 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 63444-06 for
	<pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:24:35 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from cronos.madness.at (madness.at [217.196.146.217])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE539F97B5
	for <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:24:34 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mastermind.kaltenbrunner.cc ([83.215.233.60])
	by cronos.madness.at with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
	id 1IWbNb-0003MP-8Q; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:24:30 +0200
Message-ID: <46EC154B.2050401@kaltenbrunner.cc>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:24:27 +0200
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070607)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	"Marshall, Steve" <smarshall@wsi.com>,  pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded
References: <200709141720.l8EHKwX13792@momjian.us>
	<87bqc5m90n.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
	<12919.1189792669@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<46EADA0A.3040504@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<12435.1189821208@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<46EC07E7.9000100@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<28630.1189875785@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <28630.1189875785@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200709/259
X-Sequence-Number: 3801

Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
>> yeah testing that patch now (seems to apply just fine on -HEAD) but it
>> seems that there is something strange going on because I just got:
> 
> ! ERROR:  could not read block 2 of relation 1663/16384/2606: read only 0 of 8192 bytes
> 
> Is that repeatable?  What sort of filesystem are you testing on?

that box is slow - still testing ...

> (soft-mounted NFS by any chance?)

no - local SATA disk with ext3 (no OS related errors and SMART is clean too)



Stefan