Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051182E002D for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 12:43:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08501-08 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 12:43:52 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from alexis.jtlnet.com (alexis.jtlnet.com [69.36.9.81]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC702E002C for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 12:43:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.10.103] (cpe-075-177-177-228.nc.res.rr.com [::ffff:75.177.177.228]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by alexis.jtlnet.com with esmtp; Fri, 16 May 2008 11:43:28 -0400 id 0008BBE6.482DABA1.00000EF6 Message-ID: <482DABB4.8040104@dunslane.net> Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:43:48 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20071019 Fedora/1.0.9-3.fc6 pango-text SeaMonkey/1.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: Merlin Moncure , Andrew Chernow , Alvaro Herrera , "Patches (PostgreSQL)" Subject: Re: libpq object hooks References: <6044.1210867771@sss.pgh.pa.us> <482C77E5.1060500@esilo.com> <9458.1210875556@sss.pgh.pa.us> <482C82BA.3090100@esilo.com> <9867.1210877054@sss.pgh.pa.us> <482CD76E.6000202@esilo.com> <17177.1210949948@sss.pgh.pa.us> <482DA66B.4000901@dunslane.net> <17642.1210951805@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <17642.1210951805@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200805/331 X-Sequence-Number: 6357 Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan writes: > >> All of this is getting quite a long way from what was in the commitfest >> queue. Do we still want to try to get this in this cycle, or should it >> be marked returned to author for more work? >> > > So far I think it still falls within the category of allowing the author > to revise his work. I don't want to hold commitfest open waiting on > revisions of this patch, but as long as there's still other stuff being > worked through I don't see why they can't keep trying. > > Just for the record, I would really like to close this fest before > PGCon starts. We still have a couple more days to get it done. > > > Apart from this one only two have not been claimed: . Map Forks . TRUNCATE TABLE with IDENTITY cheers andrew