Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1khxtV-0006fP-9j for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:43:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1khxtU-0000ua-96 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:43:48 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1khxtU-0000uN-2U for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:43:48 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1khxtS-0008JE-1i for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:43:47 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0APGhR3f493359; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:43:27 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Greg Nancarrow cc: Alvaro Herrera , Anastasia Lubennikova , Peter Smith , "Smith, Peter" , David Steele , "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" , Haribabu Kommi , Robert Haas , Laurenz Albe , Dave Cramer , Jing Wang , PostgreSQL-development , Elvis Pranskevichus Subject: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority In-reply-to: References: <20201124225917.GA21884@alvherre.pgsql> <325979.1606259987@sss.pgh.pa.us> <388250.1606266434@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Greg Nancarrow message dated "Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:04:11 +1100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <493357.1606322607.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:43:27 -0500 Message-ID: <493358.1606322607@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Greg Nancarrow writes: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:07 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> Here's a v2 that does it like that. > Looks OK to me. Thanks for looking! Pushed. At this point the cfbot is going to start complaining that the last-posted patch in this thread no longer applies. Unless you have a new patch set nearly ready to post, I think we should close the CF entry as RWF, and then you can open a new one when you're ready. regards, tom lane