Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A306863320F for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:01:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67959-04 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:01:32 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.beccati.com (ispeed-srv6.housing.tomato.it [213.92.90.60]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542D26327BF for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:01:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 76133 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2009 11:01:25 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.204?) (matteo@beccati.com@88.149.176.119) by mail.beccati.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2009 10:01:25 -0000 Message-ID: <49CB526E.6050707@beccati.com> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:01:18 +0100 From: Matteo Beccati User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guillaume Smet CC: Fujii Masao , Kevin Grittner , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby References: <3f0b79eb0903242329j12865d55s348f5c873a956e71@mail.gmail.com> <1d4e0c10903242350i505a9f6bsa7ba347dc02f90b6@mail.gmail.com> <3f0b79eb0903250144k453b3927mffa8b08678ed057b@mail.gmail.com> <1d4e0c10903250155w34bd79dcvfab2ad5c95e56011@mail.gmail.com> <49C9F255.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> <1d4e0c10903250848x4e067c86ue611c0c50f25e49d@mail.gmail.com> <3f0b79eb0903251851v5936d6b4x49997ac8f04b98b9@mail.gmail.com> <1d4e0c10903260032v767da1fdg6cf7cea86c64cc45@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1d4e0c10903260032v767da1fdg6cf7cea86c64cc45@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/1039 X-Sequence-Number: 135717 Hi, Guillaume Smet wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: >> What does "the default" mean? You mean that new trigger should use >> the existing trigger option character (-t)? > > Yes, that's my point. > > I understand it seems weird to switch the options but I'm pretty sure > a lot of persons currently using -t would be surprised by the current > behaviour. Moreover playing all the remaining WALs before starting up > should be the most natural option when people are looking in the help. > > That said, it would be nice to hear from people really using > pg_standby to know if they understand how it works now and if it's > what they intended when they set it up. My fault not RTFM well enough, but I was surprised finding out that -t is working like that. +1 for me to switch -t to the new behaviour. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati OpenX - http://www.openx.org