Subject: Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: Password
 identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
References: <21eecdb8-365b-8347-1ae2-5278d1fe798c@iki.fi>
 <CAB7nPqT2UGWm0ukdomC+mG-co6nmKer62vuSGRxwtc+jS8uQPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB7nPqQtD7jOpYCsB4Ga=Cz+tgh4Ngac6NAV-WLs9zxaw0Uu7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <762f4875-a87e-cf0b-c06b-b357294d8be1@iki.fi>
 <CAB7nPqTi5jC_AbVMOGidrVy1z6t3v==vWFvdNMxnQEN-WsutKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <2d07165c-1793-e243-a2a9-e45b624c7580@iki.fi>
 <CABUevEyi7uw41nzyFRh2xUzB6uOh-QmavcwDMhW0jCTTe4KavQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <9a7263eb-0980-2072-4424-440bb2513dc7@iki.fi>
 <CAB7nPqR4RDjr1PYKm4D+aV4gxgQduq8GWb7SmEOnvoctnvVzsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <a150e7c7-7d57-bf1c-7f73-cbbfedf99243@iki.fi>
 <20161216013114.GA1400@paquier.xyz>
 <a356e0d2-5330-2dd8-7faa-af8758db1be4@iki.fi>
 <CAB7nPqQJg_mUd7c5r4OfYPwRB5cujwPv3cZikuP8cU7cbUKi6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <6831df67-7641-1a66-4985-268609a4821f@iki.fi>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robert Haas
 <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
 David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
 David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Julian Markwort <julian.markwort@uni-muenster.de>,
 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
 PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Valery Popov <v.popov@postgrespro.ru>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Organization: 2ndQuadrant
Message-ID: <49dca243-5d04-55cf-660e-bca52c3955df@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 08:31:14 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6831df67-7641-1a66-4985-268609a4821f@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On 1/3/17 9:09 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Since not everyone agrees with this approach, I split this patch into 
> two. The first patch refactors things, replacing the isMD5() function 
> with get_password_type(), without changing the representation of 
> pg_authid.rolpassword. That is hopefully uncontroversial. And the second 
> patch adds the "plain:" prefix, which not everyone agrees on.
> 
> Barring objections I'm going to at least commit the first patch. I think 
> we should commit the second one too, but it's not as critical, and the 
> first patch matters more for the SCRAM patch, too.

Is there currently anything to review here for the commit fest?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers