Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDD7635599 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 17:06:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00790-01-5 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 17:06:05 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp.anarazel.de (mail.anarazel.de [217.115.131.40]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE70A63577D for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 17:04:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.224.203] (e178231146.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.231.146]) by smtp.anarazel.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91A25448003; Thu, 28 May 2009 22:04:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A1EEE43.7080502@anarazel.de> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:04:19 +0200 From: Andres Freund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090527 Shredder/3.0b3pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up References: <10273.1243343651@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20090527212240.GP15213@yugib.highrise.ca> <603c8f070905271829i9458bdftcaed2dadb0a74583@mail.gmail.com> <20090528020909.GQ15213@yugib.highrise.ca> <603c8f070905271942ke9df2aah8648fe4d1228d43e@mail.gmail.com> <20090528125944.GS15213@yugib.highrise.ca> <603c8f070905280649m5d5fc458se54435dfe20cc7ca@mail.gmail.com> <4A1E9D98.7030208@dunslane.net> <8547.1243522369@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4136ffa0905280804i1653d716j7a39468fc56b5e5c@mail.gmail.com> <603c8f070905280838s5bebb79bn37e4dc4a6c97daf7@mail.gmail.com> <11350.1243527579@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <11350.1243527579@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.231 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.231 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200905/1310 X-Sequence-Number: 138852 Hi, On 05/28/2009 06:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I am hoping that git's cvs server emulation is complete enough that you > can commit through it --- anybody know? But that will be just a > stopgap. Comitting is no problem - you can't tag, branch or merge through it though (Not really surprisingly I think). > BTW, can anyone comment on whether and how we can maintain the current > split between master repository (that's not even accessible to > non-committers) and a public mirror? If only from a standpoint of > security paranoia, I'd rather like to preserve that split, but I don't > know how well git will play with it. Absolutely not a problem (Doing such things is one of the strengths of git). Andres