Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B843634915 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:59:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14298-06 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:59:31 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597CA6338A8 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:59:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AECDCD3D5; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:59:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mha-laptop.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223981241D8; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:59:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A26BA00.1040102@hagander.net> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:59:28 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is? References: <19107.1243873940@sss.pgh.pa.us> <603c8f070906012050p6ccd62d3v13d3e0f887fe7c90@mail.gmail.com> <15765.1243965376@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4A25C32F.30203@agliodbs.com> <4A263E7F.9040702@hagander.net> <7903.1244051691@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <7903.1244051691@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200906/349 X-Sequence-Number: 139404 Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >> Josh Berkus wrote: >>> * Path separator consistency on Windows >>> >>> -- This discussion does not appear to have concluded. Magnus, Dave? > >> We've lived with this for a long time, it's nothing new. And it's not >> critical. Bump to 8.5. > > This is partly my fault, since I objected to the proposed refactoring > of path.c but didn't get around to offering a concrete alternative. > But I agree it's noncritical and a bit too late for 8.4. > > I moved the entry to TODO, but maybe it should be on the next CommitFest > page instead? There were proposed patches submitted. CommitFest sounds best to me. -- Magnus Hagander Self: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/