Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A9F634946 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:55:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39419-08 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:54:59 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp [222.151.198.100]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D1E63228E for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:55:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E9B248262; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:55:02 +0900 (JST) Received: from serv1.oss.ntt.co.jp (serv1.localdomain [172.19.0.2]) by serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B38248261; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:55:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [172.17.1.145]) by serv1.oss.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BD2104202; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:55:01 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4A287AF3.9000301@oss.ntt.co.jp> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:54:59 +0900 From: Tatsuhito Kasahara User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Grittner CC: Greg Stark , Asko Oja , Simon Riggs , decibel , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, "kasahara(OSSC)" Subject: Re: display previous query string of idle-in-transaction References: <49C9F49B.8020003@oss.ntt.co.jp> <1238091273.16568.530.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant> <49CC75E3.7010101@oss.ntt.co.jp> <1238139418.16568.555.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant> <4136ffa0906030724g72a56165s33819f3060002dcb@mail.gmail.com> <4A264377.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov> In-Reply-To: <4A264377.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.173 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.173 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200906/445 X-Sequence-Number: 139500 Kevin Grittner wrote: > Greg Stark wrote: >> Should this patch be on the commitfest page for 8.5? Or is there a >> consensus already that it's a bad idea? >> >> Personally I actually think this makes a lot of sense to do. > > +1 > > It at least gives one a reasonable chance to get a useful clue.... +1 # And I'm going to register this patch on the next commitfest page. -- Tatsuhito Kasahara kasahara.tatsuhito@oss.ntt.co.jp