Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C2D6333B2 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:43:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56488-07 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:43:45 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from alexis.jtlnet.com (alexis.jtlnet.com [69.36.9.81]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A475962F51F for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:43:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.10.103] (cpe-075-177-154-027.nc.res.rr.com [::ffff:75.177.154.27]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by alexis.jtlnet.com with esmtp; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:42:51 -0400 id 00087DC2.4A4D29DC.00002FE0 Message-ID: <4A4D2A0F.3000607@dunslane.net> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:43:43 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20071019 Fedora/1.0.9-3.fc6 pango-text SeaMonkey/1.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jd@commandprompt.com CC: Alvaro Herrera , Jaime Casanova , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: TODO items References: <3073cc9b0907021428i35432ec8j55b25f951da116e8@mail.gmail.com> <20090702212942.GM4698@alvh.no-ip.org> <1246570508.17276.25.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org> In-Reply-To: <1246570508.17276.25.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.072 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.072 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200907/174 X-Sequence-Number: 140796 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:29 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Jaime Casanova wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right? >>> >> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving >> those items to it? >> > > For historical record I could see benefit. > > Doesn't the wiki keep a page history? I don't see much point in keeping the old items in a current page. cheers andrew