Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831EF633522 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:49:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84989-04 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:49:34 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from alexis.jtlnet.com (alexis.jtlnet.com [69.36.9.81]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6E76351CF for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:49:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.10.103] (cpe-075-177-154-027.nc.res.rr.com [::ffff:75.177.154.27]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by alexis.jtlnet.com with esmtp; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:47:12 -0400 id 0008BBBD.4A5F83C1.00000ADC Message-ID: <4A5F844E.9030104@dunslane.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:49:34 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20071019 Fedora/1.0.9-3.fc6 pango-text SeaMonkey/1.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David E. Wheeler" CC: Dimitri Fontaine , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: navigation menu for documents References: <4A5CE7EB.20809@pgexperts.com> <27A6A4DD-A84D-4C96-A7E1-38017070B7D1@hi-media.com> <4A5D04F1.4070801@dunslane.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.064 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.064 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200907/1017 X-Sequence-Number: 141639 David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> Yes, really. What you suggest here is just not adequate, IMNSHO. I >> don't want to have to scroll to the top or bottom of the page to get >> navigation, and I want to be able to see the navigation and go where >> I want directly. > > Hey Andrew, > > Check out what I've done for the Bricolage documentation: > > http://www.bricolagecms.org/docs/devel/api/ > > I'm using jQuery to pull the proper doc into a div. I'm still noodling > with it, trying to fix encoding issues on Windows, but it's pretty > close to done. > > Yes, that's nice, it's just the sort of thing I had in mind - if you can do it with a div instead of frames I'm fine with that. cheers andrew