Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D951633EAE for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 01:05:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89229-03 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:05:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from alexis.jtlnet.com (alexis.jtlnet.com [69.36.9.81]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A082633AD3 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 01:05:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.10.103] (cpe-075-177-154-027.nc.res.rr.com [::ffff:75.177.154.27]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by alexis.jtlnet.com with esmtp; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:03:54 -0400 id 00083BF0.4A878537.00006DA1 Message-ID: <4A87854B.3070707@dunslane.net> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:04:27 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20071019 Fedora/1.0.9-3.fc6 pango-text SeaMonkey/1.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Haas CC: Peter Eisentraut , Sam Mason , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema References: <603c8f070908050951s3e5df452se4c610f01b80bb7d@mail.gmail.com> <4A7FE7F902000025000296E3@gw.wicourts.gov> <4A803A89.9020509@dunslane.net> <2CCE9C1D-919D-45D5-BFC2-C7723C45064E@hi-media.com> <162867790908150434j7aef36ecm202e81c4bb4740fa@mail.gmail.com> <4A86B5D5.6060807@dunslane.net> <4A871F46.1040002@agliodbs.com> <5D5ECAE0-F2B0-479B-9594-50AAF18F10ED@hi-media.com> <20090815223102.GS5407@samason.me.uk> <1250378139.18992.6.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <603c8f070908152051mbd1d706hb0e29f5cfaf2f151@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <603c8f070908152051mbd1d706hb0e29f5cfaf2f151@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.599 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200908/1215 X-Sequence-Number: 143858 Robert Haas wrote: > > I like this idea (although it might not be too easy to implement, not > sure), but I think we could still use DO (which is shorter) for the > verb. Lambda-calculus is cool, but "do" is nice and simple. > > > SQL is not Lisp. Simple is good. I didn't think Peter was really very serious. cheers andrew