Message-ID: <4AD67917.5000504@ak.jp.nec.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:21:27 +0900
From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
CC: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
	kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp
Subject: Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)
References: <4AC5A14F.6050306@ak.jp.nec.com>	
	<20091012024604.GW17756@tamriel.snowman.net>	
	<4AD54082.9050001@ak.jp.nec.com>
	<603c8f070910141808r63d2a3e4m312aaa050450353d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <603c8f070910141808r63d2a3e4m312aaa050450353d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Robert Haas wrote:
> 2009/10/13 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>:
>> The attached patch is a revised one with the following updates:
> 
> Despite two fairly explicit requests, this patch (and, with the
> exception of ECPG, only this patch) has not yet been reviewed by a
> committer.
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00591.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00652.php
> 
> Are any of the committers willing to take a look at this?  Tom?
> Alvaro, maybe?  Bruce?

In actually, I cannot believe this patch to be perfectly commitable
by the 15-Oct due to the remaining time, but it is necessary to be
comittable at the head of the next commit fest.
In other word, I strongly want to continue the discussion and revising
the patch, even if it will be actually commited at the 15-Nov.

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>