Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CCC63274B for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:31:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08466-08 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:30:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from glacier.frostconsultingllc.com (glacier.frostconsultingllc.com [69.36.227.170]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CA6632629 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:30:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dsl081-245-111.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.245.111] helo=Sidney-Stratton.local) by glacier.frostconsultingllc.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Onar6-0000XN-QZ for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:30:56 -0700 Message-ID: <4C72B03A.3030708@agliodbs.com> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:30:34 -0700 From: Josh Berkus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this? References: <201008221651.o7MGplA28857@momjian.us> <1282579975-sup-2769@alvh.no-ip.org> <22915.1282581632@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <22915.1282581632@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/1641 X-Sequence-Number: 168444 All, FYI, the system which sparked this original discussion turned out, on extensive analysis, to have ZFS-level filesystem corruption. The polling issues were related to that rather than to Postgres. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com