Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15AF1337B55 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:12:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24786-06 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:12:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from exprod7og114.obsmtp.com (exprod7og114.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.215]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E91241337B47 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:12:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from source ([209.85.215.182]) by exprod7ob114.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTJxrjmYCSkeFAotDh+wIY8sq2GtGFHBp@postini.com; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 02:12:48 PDT Received: by eyx24 with SMTP id 24so1034021eyx.41 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 02:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.4.205 with SMTP id 13mr2818113ebs.70.1285319566056; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 02:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.117] (dsl-hkibrasgw2-ff7ac300-240.dhcp.inet.fi [88.195.122.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a48sm2754378eei.7.2010.09.24.02.12.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 02:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C9C6B86.3040102@enterprisedb.com> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:12:38 +0300 From: Heikki Linnakangas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi-FI; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100619 Iceowl/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Itagaki Takahiro CC: Robert Haas , SAKAMOTO Masahiko , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL References: <4C905DB0.6040302@oss.ntt.co.jp> <4C934741.4070102@oss.ntt.co.jp> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/1672 X-Sequence-Number: 170536 On 24/09/10 06:26, Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I think we need to further discuss how this is eventually going to get >> integrated with the query planner and the executor before we commit >> anything. The syntax support by itself is quite trivial. > > There are no active discussions :-( I think the author tried his best, so if > other developers think it's a bad design, alternate plan must be proposed. It's not that the design is bad, it's that it's non-existent. I haven't seen any design on how this integrates with the planner. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com