Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACB11337C0F for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:12:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79188-01-3; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:12:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.cybertec.at (mail.cybertec.at [87.118.110.48]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5CD1337C0E; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:56:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from host-87-242-31-234.prtelecom.hu (host-87-242-31-234.prtelecom.hu [87.242.31.234]) by mail.cybertec.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703815FC194; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CB6D3C8.3020709@cybertec.at> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:56:24 +0200 From: Boszormenyi Zoltan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Haas CC: Heikki Linnakangas , Bruce Momjian , Michael Meskes , PG Hackers , Hans-Juergen Schoenig Subject: Re: ECPG FETCH readahead References: <201006232042.o5NKgb503695@momjian.us> <4C2308FD.1090300@cybertec.at> <4C231F9E.6000102@enterprisedb.com> <20100624121922.GD24137@feivel.credativ.lan> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201010/887 X-Sequence-Number: 171927 Hi, Robert Haas írta: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:04:30PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> >>> Is there a reason not to enable it by default? I'm a bit worried >>> that it will receive no testing if it's not always on. >>> >> Yes, there is a reason, namely that you don't need it in native mode at all. >> ECPG can read as many records as you want in one go, something ESQL/C >> apparently cannot do. This patch is a workaround for that restriction. I still >> do not really see that this feature gives us an advantage in native mode >> though. >> > > So, who has the next action on this patch? Does Zoltan need to revise > it, or does Michael need to review it, or where are we? > Michael reviewed it shortly in private and I need to send a new revision anyway, regardless of his comments. I will refresh it ASAP. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi -- ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/