Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F11A1337B5B for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:42:34 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97486-06 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:42:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from cronos.madness.at (madness.at [217.196.146.217]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC731337B56 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:42:26 -0400 (AST) Received: from gatekeeper.kaltenbrunner.cc ([83.215.243.9] helo=[192.168.8.22]) by cronos.madness.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYMW7-0006zi-1A; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:42:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4D1CC47E.7050207@kaltenbrunner.cc> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:42:22 +0100 From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101030 Iceowl/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Riggs CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design References: <1293729972.1892.23804.camel@ebony> In-Reply-To: <1293729972.1892.23804.camel@ebony> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201012/2483 X-Sequence-Number: 177745 On 12/30/2010 06:26 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: > > I've mulled over the design for sync rep for awhile now, and have come > up with a feature set that includes the final detailed feedback from > Fujii Masao, Aidan Van Dyk, Josh Berkus and others. > > The design also draws from MySQL concepts to make the two interfaces as > similar and as simple as possible. It should be noted that the design > presented here has many features that the MySQL design does not. > > I am currently finishing up my patch to offer these features, so its > time to begin final discussions. > > As an interim step, I enclose a PDF version of relevant excerpts from > the doc patch. The patch will follow on a later post in the near future. > > I would like to separate discussions on "user interface" from that of > internal design, to make it easier for more people to get involved. > Please read the following and post your comments. Thank you. it would help if this would just be a simple text-only description of the design that people can actually comment on inline. I don't think sending technical design proposals as a pdf (which seems to be written in doc-style as well) is a good idea to encourage discussion on -hackers :( Stefan