Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB019B5D800
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:30:17 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 55488-02
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from exprod7og104.obsmtp.com (exprod7og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.161])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1578DB5DC17
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:30:10 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) (using TLSv1) by
	exprod7ob104.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP
	ID DSNKTjAvAGy7mGBdQt2+QqP1tG2PrvuSkuer@postini.com;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:30:11 PDT
Received: by wyg30 with SMTP id 30so1280231wyg.20
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.74.131 with SMTP id u3mr183644faj.113.1311780605512;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.183] (dsl-hkibrasgw2-ff7ac300-240.dhcp.inet.fi
	[88.195.122.240])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x13sm122234fah.29.2011.07.27.08.30.03
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E302EFA.2000300@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:30:02 +0300
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; fi-FI;
	rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Icedove/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
CC: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
References: <BANLkTikgOQ1+r=A9b08szNTeEWsk-cNMMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpHfduE1LM7aCk7MZ_u_n2z58Jxps=TBD0eX4WX4gwBrkk=Yw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpHfdvcAo2L2RVtnr+BtPE18Q4mJLaLf-R7SrKMTUousv8ChA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E1DA4CB.9020209@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAPpHfdvSC3p7zR_BwbNhm+3fvg8b-rwe+p=HJ9Gii8_rethbuw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E1EABD9.5000308@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAPpHfdsO3BBEXzBwcrVGHXE=dYUOhQ+corT3gLLtCkjNXacHoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpHfdv=V+UGFyq=EJeLUzxygN3m63H0yocX4jsAmEBha7NKRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E1F5763.9090109@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAPpHfdszFQ7KyWurN7+AMSdG-v4m-p=HgpLPH=XUZqbnGJf+og@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpHfdtVJJyinb1TuFF3gw6-YLre2O9svUZgZGAWzogXswP6Bg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpHfdvoOh78ycX3eRePTS29635pHCSTfLdFDzHZhxTKsggCuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E2DBB60.80604@enterprisedb.com>
	<4E2EF83A.8000304@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAPpHfduMXGF=cpQsDS=9YLpY7+E1tf=Qk107+iv4savvXYNZ8g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E301B3E.5080707@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAPpHfdu9euc5=9D3kC+cuOa4N0=4nQKY1hu=oSvHbrSnApa4gg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPpHfdu9euc5=9D3kC+cuOa4N0=4nQKY1hu=oSvHbrSnApa4gg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201107/1467
X-Sequence-Number: 192566

On 27.07.2011 17:43, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>>      1(l:1) blk: 324 numTuple: 129 free: 2472b(69.71%) rightlink:4294967295
> (InvalidBlockNumber)
>>          1(l:2) blk: 242 numTuple: 164 free: 932b(88.58%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>>          2(l:2) blk: 525 numTuple: 121 free: 2824b(65.39%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>>          3(l:2) blk: 70 numTuple: 104 free: 3572b(56.23%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>>          4(l:2) blk: 384 numTuple: 106 free: 3484b(57.30%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>>          5(l:2) blk: 555 numTuple: 121 free: 2824b(65.39%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>>          6(l:2) blk: 564 numTuple: 109 free: 3352b(58.92%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>>          7(l:2) blk: 165 numTuple: 108 free: 3396b(58.38%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
> .....
>
> Isn't it a bug?

Yeah, looks like a bug. I must've messed up the WAL logging in my recent 
changes to this. I'll look into that.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com