Message-ID: <4EAB0B9B.3080103@commandprompt.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:07:55 -0700
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:7.0) Gecko/20110923 Thunderbird/7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
CC: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
References: <28669.1319831456@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmoZLMnT=r7XGRzW2QjQQ8DwnWgzHkWBC=VGq1dLqcTn2rQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+TgmoZLMnT=r7XGRzW2QjQQ8DwnWgzHkWBC=VGq1dLqcTn2rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


>> * unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
>>
>> This one also seems to be lacking consensus more than anything else.
>> What do we do about that?
>
> AFAIR, the only person objecting is Simon.  I'm not necessarily saying
> that means we should drive it in over his objections, but OTOH there
> were quite a few people who spoke in favor of it and we shouldn't
> ignore those voices either.

The problem is, it will break tools. I was one of the people that 
supported Simon in his argument against. Not going to cause a huge stink 
but it is something to consider.

JD

>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579