Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6F712FE952 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:38:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from smtp.01.com ([199.36.142.181]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFtRz-00040s-0i for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:38:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7674F4FB6 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:38:22 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-2.01.com Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8qK8FmyYf17L for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:38:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0A94F5CD3 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:38:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from Sidney-Stratton.local (70-36-143-92.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [70.36.143.92]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03F094F4FB6 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:38:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4F7E02BD.5010406@agliodbs.com> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:38:21 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Organization: PostgreSQL Experts Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Last gasp References: <1333651599.31440.47.camel@hvost> <1333653659.31440.68.camel@hvost> <1333655785.15576.13.camel@hvost> In-Reply-To: <1333655785.15576.13.camel@hvost> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/276 X-Sequence-Number: 206079 On 4/5/12 12:56 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote: >> Really? You've never seen a patch punted to the next release before >> > because it wasn't robust enough? Considering that I see your name >> > mentioned in the 8.2 release notes, I find that a bit hard to believe. > I must admit I did check it only occasionally and to me it seemed to > come along nicely. I have to agree ... for anyone just following the email thread, the patch did not seem to be in trouble. I'm not clear that Dimitri knew that it was, either. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com