Message-ID: <4F845379.9000703@cybertec.at>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:36:25 +0200
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>,
	Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
References: <4F74E6A7.8040204@cybertec.at>
	<20120407112008.GA2286@feivel.credativ.lan>
	<20120407155042.GB11987@tornado.leadboat.com>
	<20120408142501.GA21513@feivel.credativ.lan>
	<4F81BE55.1010904@cybertec.at>
	<20120408173859.GA4915@feivel.credativ.lan>
	<4F83E2B9.3030302@cybertec.at>
	<20120410143722.GC6129@tornado.leadboat.com>
	<20120410145501.GA11554@feivel.credativ.lan>
	<4F8450C7.7000707@cybertec.at>
	<20120410153427.GA14626@feivel.credativ.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20120410153427.GA14626@feivel.credativ.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2012-04-10 17:34 keltez=C3=A9ssel, Michael Meskes =C3=ADrta:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> OK. Next question: now that both patches are intended to be applied,
>> should I send a unified single patch that contains the previous functi=
onality
>> and the required fixes or a new one that only contains the last requir=
ed fixes?
> I'm fine with whatever is easier for you.
>
> Michael

I guess the second option is easier for all of us because
reviewing it doesn't invalidate the previous ones.

Best regards,
Zolt=C3=A1n B=C3=B6sz=C3=B6rm=C3=A9nyi

--=20
----------------------------------
Zolt=C3=A1n B=C3=B6sz=C3=B6rm=C3=A9nyi
Cybertec Sch=C3=B6nig&  Sch=C3=B6nig GmbH
Gr=C3=B6hrm=C3=BChlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
      http://www.postgresql.at/