Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC26364149 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:01:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKM5X-0002Xn-9C for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 04:01:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.6] (mail.highperformancepostgresql.com [71.179.240.8]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MSmwb-1SjxaE3YnN-00Rnyb; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:01:21 +0200 Message-ID: <4F8E3C8F.8030301@2ndQuadrant.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:01:19 -0400 From: Greg Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111120 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: Robert Haas , Magnus Hagander , Jay Levitt , Alex , Dimitri Fontaine , Alvaro Herrera , Peter Eisentraut , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need References: <4F84D3A0.8010808@2ndQuadrant.com> <1334165303.25392.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <28338.1334168965@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1334180206.25392.39.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <1334350086.9019.16.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <878vhyeqyq.fsf@commandprompt.com> <4F89ED6C.4030609@gmail.com> <87d379mwan.fsf@commandprompt.com> <1334540156-sup-2520@alvh.no-ip.org> <878vhwnjhv.fsf@hi-media-techno.com> <877gxf7ihf.fsf_-_@commandprompt.com> <4F8C93B2.1000503@gmail.com> <14172.1334716224@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4F8E3394.5040801@2ndQuadrant.com> <19323.1334720651@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <19323.1334720651@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:+rtYEtkl1HtqpfC/VBCDqBA8WLA2gNeoiv7Iy9uXRks C2xWqSsqp4qgzNI8hEKQzdiRNodyD7PdpJpJSC7sPFlLQr5dIB U+D6wWz2DYRT8aoQDy7LDmrha0fYKqVwIkFu2Dy1TqHGQ/ItB1 g9/0AGIYzJcBcVBjVHYzMAndQxPxUkZKkTCDKYbo5WeCXvfvRy WczjV50NPGfqUt17HTUd6BluQ9TlMTkaPvQtAO/+/Q1LwJjjDr 8LahsaHztfZ4dfc8/Dpu8g89W3ROjNh08eCSWYyaE7q4Ioxvy+ DWSboV0POxQJ/d3XDfkh9FB4kgSN6Zrw9ZSLeEiuFoWC8O5vR3 Tt0BAntuHceMNqiV2tGo= X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/950 X-Sequence-Number: 206753 On 04/17/2012 11:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > At the same time, I think we'd likely be a lot better off squirting this > data into bugzilla or another standard tracker, instead of building our > own infrastructure. Perhaps. It just struck me that a lot of the custom bits needed here regardless could be built/added to the usual workflow bottom-up. You don't have to assume that either a full tracker or something like my simple POC idea will show up at the end to get started. Making goal #1 involve just mining for the data that's already around and squirting it onto a web page would be a useful exercise, one that's likely to benefit any tracker adoption. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com