Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C887A1C315B2 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:45:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKX4h-0000Gs-QP for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:45:48 +0000 X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.148 Received: from mfilter20-d.gandi.net (mfilter20-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.148]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A581720AB; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:45:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter20-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter20-d.gandi.net (mfilter20-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZrFSg0ziGni; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:45:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 98.27.54.176 Received: from [192.168.10.146] (cpe-098-027-054-176.nc.res.rr.com [98.27.54.176]) (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9758817208B; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:45:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F8EE18A.3020708@dunslane.net> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:45:14 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Grittner CC: Alex Shulgin , Peter Eisentraut , Greg Smith , Dimitri Fontaine , Alvaro Herrera , Jay Levitt , Robert Haas , Magnus Hagander , Pg Hackers , TomLane Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need References: <4F84D3A0.8010808@2ndQuadrant.com> <1334165303.25392.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <28338.1334168965@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1334180206.25392.39.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <1334350086.9019.16.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <878vhyeqyq.fsf@commandprompt.com> <4F89ED6C.4030609@gmail.com> <87d379mwan.fsf@commandprompt.com> <1334540156-sup-2520@alvh.no-ip.org> <878vhwnjhv.fsf@hi-media-techno.com> <877gxf7ihf.fsf_-_@commandprompt.com> <4F8C93B2.1000503@gmail.com> <87y5ptgwhp.fsf@commandprompt.com> <1334758777.29544.16.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <4F8E978F02000025000470E7@gw.wicourts.g ov> In-Reply-To: <4F8E978F02000025000470E7@gw.wicourts.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/985 X-Sequence-Number: 206788 On 04/18/2012 11:29 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On ons, 2012-04-18 at 13:33 +0300, Alex Shulgin wrote: >>> I wonder why do people keep complaining how their bug tracker of >>> choice sucks, instead of doing something about that. >> Lack of time, and to some degree a lack of clarity of what they >> want out of the thing. (Most people are very clear on what they >> don't want.) > > Personally, I haven't worked with one which had the data organized > in what I would consider a sensible and useful way. Part of the trouble is that the whole area is fuzzy. So any organization that imposes some sort of order on the data will not fit well in some cases. Most tracker systems have ended up either trying to cater for increasingly complex and varied circumstances, or staying simple and more or less throwing in the towel on the complexity problem. That doesn't necessarily mean that it's not worth having a tracker, just that we need to recognize the limitations. cheers andrew